tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6023206986855788708.post6997964025513644263..comments2009-11-03T23:37:37.885-10:00John Templehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09915698648746207719noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6023206986855788708.post-39779158832303217832009-11-03T23:37:37.885-10:002009-11-03T23:37:37.885-10:00Hi,<br />I get the same error that re-directs me to the gmail sign-in page....<br /><br /><a href="http://www.tarjeta-r4-ds.es" rel="nofollow">comprar r4 nintendo ds</a>darrenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04094166348816578844noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6023206986855788708.post-18835955458329108062009-07-10T05:06:20.224-10:002009-07-10T05:06:20.224-10:00I apologize, but the links to the pdfs I offered do not work. I have uploaded the Marburgers&#39; three documents to mediafire.com and you should be able to access them as pdfs at this url.<br /><br />http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=dc71e860ba266d13d0d290dca69ceb5cb72cb627fb2585c4ce018c8114394287John Templehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09915698648746207719noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6023206986855788708.post-84833945354612465612009-07-10T04:15:20.748-10:002009-07-10T04:15:20.748-10:00I&#39;m also unable to view or download the documents. I get the same error that re-directs me to the gmail sign-in page, whether I&#39;m signed in already or not.jonathanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17821709841773337916noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6023206986855788708.post-25263644804201595472009-07-10T03:25:41.011-10:002009-07-10T03:25:41.011-10:00Oh, and please Mr. Marburger-- &quot;at my firm&#39;s standard rates, these analyses would have cost well over $100,000.&quot; Get over yourself. Welcome to the internet; people discuss things for free here.Chrishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06918703988508764584noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6023206986855788708.post-37874595170054560052009-07-10T03:22:53.577-10:002009-07-10T03:22:53.577-10:00John,<br /><br />I actually think what&#39;s going on is that Schultz might have been *too honest* about the possible, ultimate implications of their argument, and what we&#39;re seeing is some sort of turgid legal walkback, complicated by the Marburger&#39;s inability to communicate their ideas in anything shorter than thousands of words. I agree that a more serious review of what they&#39;re actually saying is neccessary, but the waters are now sufficently muddy to make understanding what&#39;s actually going on here hard for all but the most committed.Chrishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06918703988508764584noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6023206986855788708.post-32404859886886360972009-07-09T18:57:36.608-10:002009-07-09T18:57:36.608-10:00I&#39;m unable to view or download the attachments, some googlemail error. Googlemail?gkamphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00838504980086249672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6023206986855788708.post-65854750723878005222009-07-09T15:10:39.554-10:002009-07-09T15:10:39.554-10:00Just another ambulance chaser plowing new ground in which to cultivate litigation.lincolnparishnewsonlinehttp://lincolnparishnewsonline.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.com